 |
Shop by Category |
 |
|
 |
|

(Your shopping cart is empty)
| |
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Quiet indeed |
March 26, 2009 |
| Reviewer:
Lee Rothman
from Salt Lake City, Utah
|
|
There's no doubt about it, there is NO self noise to be heard on this mic PERIOD. It's wonderful as you can back off the rest of your signal chain and end up with nothing but the sound of what it is you are trying to capture. This mic is especially fine on acoustic instruments like guitar. It easily captures all of the air and overtones with NO eq needed. A marvelous tool to have in the arsenal. I found on certain male voices it can save you from the need to eq afterwards as well. Woodwinds will benefit from it's extremely open character. For it's price it is absurd NOT to have one in he mic locker.
Thank you for your feedback on this review. We appreciate your input!
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| |
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
My best microphone buy |
April 13, 2006 |
| Reviewer:
Bojan Sernek
from Ljubljana, / Slovenia
|
|
I wasn't really sure what to expect of this mike, since I hadn't tried any Rode gear before, but this mike definitely gets my thumbs up. I use the "matched pair" variant for the drum overheads, and most of the comments I get from drummers I record are "you made my cymbals sound like Sabians". Which is a very good thing indeed - everyone loves those expensive bright cymbals.
I've also used them on female vocals, which is what this mike does very, very good. I've tried it with more than a dozen, and it never fails to make the vocalists in question sound big and present.
Be warned, however, this mike is hot! It's got a healthy output but at the same time very low noise floor. There are some things I couldn't get it to do well, however, like certain male vocals that had this certain harsheness, no matter how you attempt to EQ it out - it always, however, happened with aggressive singers and never with a female vocalist.
Thank you for your feedback on this review. We appreciate your input!
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|